let me respond to my friend, the gentleman from California, by saying first of all, I do distinguish the bill as it is currently written with a volunteer verification system from the mandatory verification system that we had at the phase of the subcommittee. It was for that reason we felt we could distinguish the two and take out the testers. I want to say that the amendment that is going to be offered in the next day or two by the gentleman from California [Mr. Gallegly], to make the verification system mandatory does include the testers provisions, so that is more of a parallel. We had it mandatory in subcommittee, the testers are still in the amendment, making the verification system.
William F. Smith: “let me respond to my friend, the gentleman from California, by saying first of all, I do distinguish the bill as it is…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the differences between volunteer and mandatory verification systems in a bill.
Share
More from William F. Smith
this week NBC News aired an interview with President Bush in which it removed key statements from the President's response to a question about diplomatic relations with Iran. While some editing is to be expected, in this case NBC…
Mr. Speaker, today we honor Cyndi Taylor Krier, a distinguished public servant who has spent more than a quarter of a century in local, State and Federal public office in the executive, legislative and judicial branches of government…
Mr. Speaker, we all took an oath in this Chamber to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States from all enemies, both foreign and domestic. That is what this debate here today is really all about. By allowing the Protect…
Howard Kurtz, host of CNN's program ``Reliable Sources,'' has strongly criticized the media's coverage of Senator Barack Obama's breaking his promise that he would accept public campaign funds. Last Sunday, Kurtz argued: ``All of these…





