it is a great honor again to appear before the House on this most important and weighty topic. The nomination of Mr. Estrada means a great deal to all Americans, but especially to the minority communities. The President should be commended and applauded for seeking diversity in all departments, agencies and branches of government. To the extent that he actually accomplishes that is the true question that lies before us in the Miguel Estrada nomination. I want to start off with, I guess, my understanding of how Federal judges gain their positions, which in many ways are the most powerful positions held by any public official. To start with, it is a lifetime appointment. There is no election, there is no review. That individual, once appointed, will remain there for an indefinite period of time. Constitutionally, the President of the United States does have the authority, the duty and the responsibility to nominate individuals to the Federal bench, all the way up to the Supreme Court of the United States.
Vicente Gonzalez: “it is a great honor again to appear before the House on this most important and weighty topic. The nomination of Mr.…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the nomination of Miguel Estrada and its implications for diversity in the federal judiciary.
Share
More from Vicente Gonzalez
I've actually written letters to the President asking him not to lift Title 42. I mean, we're still not completely out of a pandemic.
I want to thank Mr. Bradley first, thank you. Some of the comments that you have made about the disparity between Blacks, Latinos, and the rest of the population is wonderful.
I am proud of the work we are doing to expand access to capital, protect American consumers, and strengthen our economy.
I can assure you, it won't be long before we have tens of thousands of people showing up on the border, and it will be catastrophic for our country, for our region, and for our district.





