On the recordDecember 2, 2010
I, too, rise along with my colleague from Texas to protect the integrity of this House. I just simply want to do it in a different manner than the wording that is reflected in this resolution, which is not there. And it is not just. And I think we have an opportunity to still protect the integrity and reputation of this House, but to do it in a fair and reasonable manner. You have heard about all of the allegations, but I want to quote from what transpired during that committee hearing. Mr. Butterfield states: ``In all of your investigation of this matter, do you see any evidence of personal financial benefit or corruption?'' And the prosecuting attorney, the one that may have recommended the censure, replies, ``I see no evidence of corruption. Do I--do I believe, based on this record, that Congressman Rangel took steps to enrich himself based on his position in Congress? I do not.'' This is a chance for this House to rise to the occasion and to do the right thing. And that's what furthers the reputation and the good name of this House, by doing the fair and just thing. We are held to a higher standard, and that's why Mr. Rangel has admitted to his misdeeds. But since when do we forfeit the right to fair and just treatment? Since when? When we take the oath of Members of Congress? I think not. We are a jury today. And if you were a jury, you'd be admonished, do not let prejudice, bias, or sympathy play any part in your deliberations.
