--and of course I hope that we do have a vote on the DREAM Act--but this is really a plea to my colleagues on the other side of the aisle to prove a former official and spokesman for the Bush administration wrong. Michael Gerson wrote yesterday in The Washington Post: ``Whatever its legislative fate, the DREAM Act is effective at stripping away pretense. Opponents of this law don't want earned citizenship for any illegal immigrant--even those personally guilty of no crime, even those who demonstrate their skills and character. The DREAM Act would be a potent incentive for assimilation. But for some, assimilation clearly is not the goal. They have no intention of sharing the honor of citizenship with anyone called illegal--even those who came as children, have grown up as neighbors and would be willing to give their lives in the Nation's cause.'' I implore and I request fair consideration and that we prove Michael Gerson wrong. My fear is that he may be very, very accurate in what this vote represents.
Vicente Gonzalez: “--and of course I hope that we do have a vote on the DREAM Act--but this is really a plea to my colleagues on the other…”
Editor's note · Context
The speaker addresses the importance of the DREAM Act and urges colleagues to support it.
Share
More from Vicente Gonzalez
With this bill, we will reverse a harmful one-size-fits-all approach that overlooks our smallest and most rural communities — and allow us to meet the individual needs of South Texas and beyond.
Are we doing anything to try to extradite those individuals who are found to be the perpetrators of those crimes?
I am proud of the work we are doing to expand access to capital, protect American consumers, and strengthen our economy.
During rollcall Vote No. 494 on H.R. 3354, I mistakenly recorded my vote as ``yea'' when I should have voted ``nay.'' Amendment No. 113 Offered by Mr. Scott of Virginia The Acting CHAIR. The unfinished business is the demand for a recorded…





