The fact that whether or not chlorine gas is a chemical weapon is even part of this conversation is baffling to me.
If Assad is so bad, he's killed 200,000 of his own people.
Is that generally our policy?
The United States views him, I think in his official policy, the President has stated it many times that he has no legitimacy, and he should...
So, if we gave them a mandate to say who is responsible, and they said Assad was responsible, then technically the U.N. could weigh in on th...
There are no tactics for making that happen.
We can enable them to stay safely in their own country, and curb these obscene breaches of humanity.
After the sarin attack, Assad didn't bomb anyone for 10 days because of the credible threat of use of force.
The regime is the only entity with air power, the only one capable of dropping barrel bombs, and at this point continued inaction by the int...
Why don't we just assassinate him? And then we get rid of him; he's gone, he's the bad guy, he's gone. But why don't we do that?
Let's say he is gone tomorrow, he's out of town, he's gone. Would that result in chaos, turmoil, or tranquility in Syria, or pick a differen...