I thank the distinguished gentleman from Ohio who just spoke on the floor of the House. He's an appropriator, and he sees this litany of limitations as being challenging. I know that Members are probably drafting some more limitations as we speak, and I certainly respect their prerogative. I would just add this point: as I listened to my good friend from Iowa--who I know is certainly a civil libertarian and believes in individual rights, and I would imagine the proponent of this amendment does as well--I would ask the proponent of the amendment, as he has listened to the debate, to simply withdraw the amendment. There are several factors that would contribute to that: one, the query that was made by the gentleman from Massachusetts as to whether the amendment even does anything. But as well, if we look at the 10th Amendment--which my friends on the other side of the aisle have always paraded before us--that even though there is a Federal law, the DOMA law, that there are matters that should be left to the States. As recounted by the gentleman from Colorado, there are many different positions on this issue throughout the different States. Some have positions, some do not. Now we have an amendment that simply seems to deal with actions stated by the executive on this very day. My friend from Iowa wanted to speak about what the President has said and what he has not said. What are we discussing here, the views of the President or the actions of the executive?…
Share
More from Sheila Jackson Lee
I first start by indicating that all of the hostages should be brought home in this heinous crisis that we are facing, and the innocent women and children and others in the Palestinian crisis should be fed and protected. Additionally, we…
It is unbelievable that we would go after innocent Americans and Members of Congress in the random searching and fishing of information that may not be relevant. In the past, ``abouts'' collection focused on collecting communications that…
--is that we need to work to help those who are most desperate and most poor---- The SPEAKER pro tempore. The time of the gentlewoman has expired.
It is important that the food and drug is able to be funded, that housing is able to be funded, and that the Department of Agriculture is able to be funded. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The time of the gentlewoman has expired.





