Without this legislation big money will control the people's voice. But what we most want to do is to break the locks and chains that big money causes in elections. We want to take away the right of those who want to demonize someone who, for example, may be interested in comprehensive immigration reform. That's their viewpoint, they're running on that. Maybe they're not. Or someone who's running against it. We don't want to have big money demonize a perspective that maybe the public should hear. I would argue that we should want to break those locks and break those chains of big money telling the American people what to do. I ask my colleagues to support H.R. 5175, the underlying bill, and the rule.
Sheila Jackson Lee: “Without this legislation big money will control the people's voice. But what we most want to do is to break the locks…”
Editor's note · Context
The speaker is advocating for the DISCLOSE Act to limit the influence of big money in elections.
Share
More from Sheila Jackson Lee
I demand a recorded vote. The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Tennessee will be postponed. Amendment No. 53 Offered by Mr. Gooden of Texas The Acting…
Who has the right to close? The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Tennessee has the right to close.
The answer to this, of course, is to give ourselves more time to address the question of serving the American people. I rise, as the leader did, to support the bipartisan Senate continuing resolution, which maintains current funding, takes…
I have the time. The Acting CHAIR. The gentlewoman from Texas may not reyield time.





