After a year in which American taxpayers saw their money wasted in high-profile failures of government-backed, so-called clean energy companies, it is surprising that DOE now uses that same term, 'double-down,' to describe the Department's budget proposal.
Ralph Hall: “After a year in which American taxpayers saw their money wasted in high-profile failures of government-backed, so-called…”
Editor's note · Context
Ralph Hall critiques the Department of Energy's budget proposal amid past failures.
Share
More from Ralph Hall
I certainly look forward to your leadership on this because it is imperative that EPA's regulatory science be judged by truly independent experts.
Some of those concerns have been raised by the Attorney General of Texas. He has filed some 30 suits, I think, against this Administration, who seems like can't tell the truth, can't even call a terrorist a terrorist.
Well, it hasn't been. It hadn't been based on science, and we have proven that many times.
I think certainly several examples such as--Dimock, Pennsylvania; Parker County, Texas; and Pavillion, Wyoming that the Chairperson alluded to where it appears that the agency is more interested in rushing judgment and placing information…





