The House favorably voted on this provision in 2001, 2003, and 2005 and again on the conference report in 2005. Additionally, the House overwhelmingly voted last year to uphold the program by voting against an amendment to strike it by a vote of 161- 255. These votes send a clear message that Congress supports this research and development program and all the benefits it will bring to the American public. Like my colleague, Mr. Lampson, I have deep admiration and respect for Chairman Norm Dicks, and accept his assurance to work with us in the future for the greatest good for the greatest number.
Ralph Hall: “The House favorably voted on this provision in 2001, 2003, and 2005 and again on the conference report in 2005.…”
On the recordJune 26, 2007
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing congressional support for a research and development program.
Share
More from Ralph Hall
Jul 24, 2013
We need to be aware of it and abreast of it and never forget it and looking at it every day, but we need to be reasonable about what we have to spend with no help from people that ought to be assisting us.
Mar 11, 2014
What has changed so dramatically in one year to allow the EPA to reach a different conclusion on the technical and economic feasibility of CCS?
Nov 13, 2013
Our nation depends on an all-of-the-above energy strategy, and the use of technologies like hydraulic fracturing have been an important role in helping achieve energy security.
Oct 29, 2013
This is another example of the government picking winners and losers. We are the losers.





