Mr. Speaker, we are continuing the debate today on the floor after we had an opportunity yesterday in the Committee on Rules to talk about this, and the bill is pretty straightforward. It says that a manufacturer of a gun, ammunition or other product that might be used, with the gun working as it was intended, we would hold them harmless; but if a person was illegally or unlawfully using these guns or obtaining these guns under some measure, that they would be held responsible. The interesting part about this, and there are so many analogies that could be used, but it would be like an automobile, which kills millions of Americans every year. It would be like an automobile that was properly designed, properly structured, properly placed upon the roadway, and there is not one parent or one person that I know of that has years of experience in using an automobile that would not say to an occupant or to someone who was going to use their car that this could be a dangerous product. But if we use it properly, then we have no worry about it.
Pete Sessions: “Mr. Speaker, we are continuing the debate today on the floor after we had an opportunity yesterday in the Committee on…”
On the recordApril 9, 2003
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing liability for gun manufacturers during a debate on gun legislation.
Share
More from Pete Sessions
Sep 3, 2024
We think we have to make it work, and we think in Congress, we have got to work together to make that work.
Jul 9, 2024
You talk about fairness, you talk about cost-effectiveness, you talk about being pragmatic, you talk about science-based answers.
Sep 3, 2024
It does not take a lot to have to sit here and listen and conjure up in your mind the undertaking that you are all involved in.
Nov 8, 2023
This past March, the inspector general of the General Services Administration issued a report into the identity verification and validation service Login.gov. Login.gov is managed by the Technology Transformation Service within GSA and was…





