risk assessment is a good concept if, and only if, risk assessment means good science. If risk assessment is only good politics, if risk assessment is only gumming up the regulatory process so that you cannot regulate and assure clean water, then it is a pretty worthless concept. We get a good dose of that in this bill, because it was not 30 minutes ago that the distinguished gentleman from California said, well, let us have it both ways. If they are going to come along and weaken the process, if they are going to come along and have waivers so that polluters can pollute a little here on the side and a little there and a little here, then let us apply risk assessment to that. Was that amendment accepted? Absolutely not, because this is a one way street for polluters. It is OK to pollute; do not get in the way of anyone trying to regulate the polluter. But if it is someone who wants to do something about regulating pollution, then let us erect as many barriers as possible.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of risk assessment in environmental regulation.
Share
More from Lloyd Doggett
as Baghdad was first bombed 23 years ago, Americans were bombarded with lies. When that giant statue of Saddam Hussein was pulled down, the lies were paired with attacks on all of us who opposed what was ultimately recognized by almost all…
While we are thankful for this belated decision of four Republicans here at the last minute to join the discharge petition, unless they join us in voting in favor of this action on the previous question, there is nothing that can be done…
from his first day in public office, President Trump has made it clear that he wants to rule America by imperial decree. He didn't want to be king just for a day in America. He wants to be king of the universe. Congress is just a nuisance…





