If I understood that last answer, about frivolous or fraudulent suits, you would get the impression that this only applies to frivolous or fraudulent suits. Is it not correct that there is no requirement to prove frivolity or to prove fraud in order to impose these burdens and lead to the garnishment of somebody's wages.
Questioning the implications of legal burdens related to frivolous or fraudulent lawsuits.
Share
More from Lloyd Doggett
He illegally rewards his pal Putin while once again blaming Zelensky for not capitulating to Putin.
This legislation provides the accountability these executives, often backed by private equity, have dodged for too long.
While we are thankful for this belated decision of four Republicans here at the last minute to join the discharge petition, unless they join us in voting in favor of this action on the previous question, there is nothing that can be done…
Once again, the corrupt Trump regime has sold off the best interests of Americans to the highest bidder—repealing modest rules after nursing home executives donated to the Trump campaign.
Other voices in this conversation
