with September drawing to a close, troubling ethical questions concerning the process of ethics in this House linger on. As a recent supreme court justice, I am concerned about the rule of law, about ethical standards, about the precedents of this House. The precedent of this House is that in every significant case since 1979, before the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct, an independent counsel has been proposed and has been implemented. The words of the gentlewoman who heads that Committee on Standards of Official Conduct today are that she thinks that naming an outside counsel could get in the way of the committee. And she says, and these are really her words this week, 'The letter of the law is not compelling to me. My goal is to have a process that the committee members feel good about.' We do not need to feel good. We need the letter of the law. We need the rule of law. There is another precedent. It's called the Packwood precedent. Delay, delay, delay, until the people of this country demand action. That is what they need to do about Speaker Gingrich.
On the recordSeptember 29, 1995
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Addressing ethical standards and the need for an independent counsel in the House.
Share
More from Lloyd Doggett
Jun 2, 2026
Once again, the corrupt Trump regime has sold off the best interests of Americans to the highest bidder—repealing modest rules after nursing home executives donated to the Trump campaign.
Nov 21, 2025
I rise to honor Michael Mucchetti, my chief of staff, for concluding 25 years of devoted service. Prior to coming to Congress, he worked with me at the Texas Supreme Court as a briefing attorney. Thereafter, he practiced law and then took…
Nov 29, 2025
There’s still a great deal more that I would like to do on behalf of the city.
Jul 2, 2025
Well, I think the Senate accomplished a near-impossible task. They took an ugly bill and they made it even uglier.





