A further question, Mr. Chairman. The gentleman mentioned diversity jurisdiction. Does this also apply with reference to removal? In other words, if someone filed their action under State law in a State court that did not have a draconian, regressive, reactionary rule like that that is being urged tonight for adoption, could they be removed, if they were against an out-of-State party, to Federal court and suddenly find themselves as a winner pay, facing all of the hardships that you have suggested will emanate from this piece of legislation?
Lloyd Doggett: “A further question, Mr. Chairman. The gentleman mentioned diversity jurisdiction. Does this also apply with reference to…”
Editor's note · Context
Questioning the implications of diversity jurisdiction and removal in relation to proposed legislation.
Share
More from Lloyd Doggett
This legislation provides the accountability these executives, often backed by private equity, have dodged for too long.
Trump is directly violating that law, lifting sanctions to permit the first Russian diesel imports into the United States since the law took effect, without satisfying the specific legal conditions it requires.
The IRS should never be a weapon to punish a president's political enemies.
We’re the greatest country on earth. We’re innovative, we’re smart, we make sure that we promote our values, our liberties and justice and freedom. We’re always trying to perfect our union, but at the same time, we were the great…





