Reclaiming my time, it does nothing to address the issue of concern about those people who are trying to ship totally legitimately poultry within the United States; that may be a totally legitimate shipment that would not be involved in game fighting that would, in fact, come under this. That is the primary concern I have. The point that I was simply trying to make, and certainly maybe his second amendment does address that, relative to whether it is intrastate or international, it probably would be addressed by his second amendment, but the other concerns that I mention, in fact, would not be addressed.
Larry Combest: “Reclaiming my time, it does nothing to address the issue of concern about those people who are trying to ship totally…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about poultry shipments in relation to proposed legislation.
Share
More from Larry Combest
Crop Insurance empowers farm and ranch families to purchase equipment and inputs, to plant the seed, to nurture and harvest their crops, to raise their livestock, and to get to market with confidence because they have something as basic as…
Mr. Chairman, just to make the record clear, subsection B of the amendment would have provided an opportunity for a point of order by the Committee on Appropriations. The gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Andrews) has worked this issue out…
You would make the adjustments into the future if, in fact, you bumped the limit. That is what the trigger mechanism is. I again oppose the amendment. I think it is totally unworkable.
Biotechnology offers extraordinary potential, not only to improve the economic viability of farms in the country, but to also help combat animal and plant diseases, improve food safety and quality, and enhance our ability to produce more…





