Political Quotes

Kay Bailey Hutchison: I want to answer some of the arguments that have been made earlier in the debate. First, it keeps being said that the…

On the recordSeptember 16, 1998
I want to answer some of the arguments that have been made earlier in the debate. First, it keeps being said that the oil companies are not paying their fair share, that they are in lawsuits about it, and that they have been settling the lawsuits and therefore they must be guilty. All of this is totally separate from the amendment before us today. There is a disagreement between the oil companies and several States about how the valuations under the present regulation have been made. I want the oil companies to pay their fair share. So does the Senator from California, so does the Senator from New Mexico, so does the Senator from Louisiana. These matters are in court, and they will be settled in court. They have nothing to do with the amendment before us today. In fact, as the Senator from New Mexico and the Senator from Louisiana have said, the oil royalty valuation process is very complicated. The new MMS proposal is very complicated. In fact, I would make the case that we do not change anything in the process as far as making it clear what is owed. It is just a matter of the Mineral Management Service raising the rates on oil companies at a time when oil prices are at an all-time low.
Said by
Kay Bailey Hutchison
Republican · Texas

Editor's note · Context

Addressing concerns about oil company payments and lawsuits during a debate on an amendment.

Share

More from Kay Bailey Hutchison

Jan 2, 2017

NATO's door is open to all European democracies which share the values of our Alliance.

congress.gov
Dec 6, 2012

I know there are those on my side who would also like to have a conference to talk about this. Could we have an indication as to the timeframe of the vote?

govinfo.gov
Jan 2, 2017

I have a very different opinion today.

congress.gov
Nov 29, 2012

let me just say that is not the only thing we could do. We could change the cost of living to the chained consumer price index. That would be OK. It wouldn't get us as much of a deficit reduction over 75 years--a chained CPI--but it would…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation