Mr. President, I appreciate Senator Stevens' putting this bill forward, along with Senator Burns, because I think this is exactly the way the process should work. I am, frankly, puzzled by some of my colleagues who are arguing that they aren't going to vote for this bill because they voted for the line-item veto. I voted for the line-item veto. This is exactly the way the process should work. The President vetoes, and the Congress does not take away its right to disagree with the President. The Congress has not taken away its right to override. In fact, that is part of the process. That is the way it is supposed to work. I don't accuse the President of partisanship. I think he has vetoed projects that he probably considers were not worthy in States and districts represented by Republicans and Democrats. But I do think the President is wrong. I think the President did not have the facts straight, and I think he has vetoed essential projects that the military has asked for, and I think we need to override this veto. In fact, the President vetoed these measures that are operational. Let me just read you a couple of examples: A repair of the launch facilities for missile systems in White Sands, NM; to expand ammunition supply facilities at Fort Bliss; consolidation of B-1B squadron operations facilities. These are projects the military has said are essential.
Kay Bailey Hutchison: “Mr. President, I appreciate Senator Stevens' putting this bill forward, along with Senator Burns, because I think this…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the need to override a presidential veto on military funding projects.
Share
More from Kay Bailey Hutchison
Decisions on enlargement are for NATO and the nation in question; no other outside country, such as Russia, has a voice in the process.
I rise to talk about the looming financial crisis that all of us here are trying to solve. We are here because we know that in 4 days something that will affect every American family in not a very good way is going to happen. We are…
I rise to talk about the Casey- Hutchison amendment which was added to the bill before us last week. I did not speak before the amendment was agreed to, but I think it is important to highlight it, particularly in light of things that…
I think, from what our intelligence community has said... that there is a good likelihood yes.





