Political Quotes

Kay Bailey Hutchison: Thank you, Madam President. I rise to join my colleague, Senator Tester, and an increasing number of cosponsors, in…

On the recordMay 6, 2010
Thank you, Madam President. I rise to join my colleague, Senator Tester, and an increasing number of cosponsors, in support of our amendment which will ensure that banks of all sizes pay their fair share in deposit insurance for the risk they pose to the banking system. Our amendment is intended to level the playing field for our safe community banks that for far too long have paid assessments into the FDIC insurance fund above and beyond the risk they pose. The FDIC levies deposit insurance premiums on a bank's total domestic deposits, but domestic deposits are not the best means to analyze the safety of banks. Financial assets other than deposits create risk in the system. Nondeposit assets are held disproportionately by larger noncommunity banks and can be more complex and more risky. Community banks with less than $10 billion in assets rely heavily on customer deposits for funding. This penalizes safe institutions by forcing them to pay deposit insurance premiums above and beyond the risk they pose to the banking system. Despite making up just 20 percent of the Nation's assets, these community banks contribute 30 percent of the premiums to the deposit insurance fund. At the same time, large banks hold 80 percent of the banking industry's assets. Yet they just pay 70 percent of the premiums. We must fix this inequality. That is what the Tester-Hutchison measure does.
Said by
Kay Bailey Hutchison
Republican · Texas
Source
govinfo.gov
May 6, 2010

Editor's note · Context

Senator Hutchison discusses an amendment to ensure fair deposit insurance premiums for community banks.

Share

More from Kay Bailey Hutchison

Jan 2, 2017

We will be asking you, Ms. McFarland, how you will represent American values in Singapore, a friend and trading partner.

congress.gov
Dec 6, 2012

I know there are those on my side who would also like to have a conference to talk about this. Could we have an indication as to the timeframe of the vote?

govinfo.gov
Jan 2, 2017

I definitely think it is in NATO's purview.

congress.gov
Dec 31, 2012

there is a lot of buzzing going on around the Capitol today. Here we are on New Year's Eve, and so many of us had hoped we would have an agreement that would be really a big agreement, a long-term agreement that we would have liked to have…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation