I would like to just get a little clearer idea of where we are. I feel like there has been a mixture of issues here. I did object to Judge Montgomery's going forward, because I wanted to finish looking at this. There are a number of people who have been concerned about the nominations that had gone through and want to look at the overall record. I am not prepared--I will object until I know a clear field and have a better idea of where we are going. But I am not saying that I will keep the objection on Judge Montgomery. But in the rhetoric that has been flying around on the floor I think the stalking bill has been brought up. I did not put them together. But in his statement the night before last, when I objected, the distinguished leader of the Democratic Party said that I should be grateful to him for his help on the stalking bill and, therefore, not use my right to object to a judge. And I was just very concerned about that, because I have worked on this stalking bill since Memorial Day. I have tried to pass a bill that would protect the stalking victims of this country since Memorial Day.
Kay Bailey Hutchison: “I would like to just get a little clearer idea of where we are. I feel like there has been a mixture of issues here. I…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing objections to judicial nominations and the stalking bill during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Kay Bailey Hutchison
Promoting American values is always important. Our strength is in our values, and our values are respect for human rights for all citizens.
I know there are those on my side who would also like to have a conference to talk about this. Could we have an indication as to the timeframe of the vote?
we are here just hours before a looming deadline that is going to affect just about every American in some way, and I do believe both sides of the aisle and both sides of the Rotunda want to come to a conclusion that will keep us from…
I have visited U.S. troops in harm's way in every conflict that we had when I was in the Senate.





