the Framers did not intend for this right to be collective. If that was their purpose, it would have been satisfied with article I, section 8 of the Constitution, which gives Congress the power ``to provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress insurrections and repel Invasions.'' The Framers went further than that. They wanted to ensure that gun ownership was recognized by posterity as an individual right. They put it in the Bill of Rights for that purpose. It is a compilation of individual rights of free speech, freedom of religion, a fair trial, and the right to keep and bear arms. The Framers looked at the governments of Europe. James Madison said: The governments of Europe are afraid to trust the people with arms. If they did, the people would surely shake off the yoke of tyranny, as America did. Later on, President Madison explained: The Constitution preserves the advantage of being armed, which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation where the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. The right to bear arms should not be an issue in the United States. The Constitution is clear, and the Supreme Court has spoken. Our Second Amendment right ensures that our people have the ability to secure all of our rights and defend them, if necessary, from government suppression. It is this right that a government of the people, by the people, and for the people must never extinguish.
Kay Bailey Hutchison: “the Framers did not intend for this right to be collective. If that was their purpose, it would have been satisfied with…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the individual right to bear arms and its constitutional basis.
Share
More from Kay Bailey Hutchison
Well, first of all, NATO is not obsolete, and I think the President has acknowledged that...
Decisions on enlargement are for NATO and the nation in question; no other outside country, such as Russia, has a voice in the process.
Absolutely. We should reinforce our efforts to get Russia to comply with the treaty, and it is the position of the American Defense Department, State Department, that Russia is in violation.
we are here just hours before a looming deadline that is going to affect just about every American in some way, and I do believe both sides of the aisle and both sides of the Rotunda want to come to a conclusion that will keep us from…





