we are not talking about a tax cut today. We are talking about a tax correction. We are talking about 21 million married couples in this country having tax equity. We have heard the arguments: This is a tax for the rich. Is a schoolteacher who makes $30,000 a year and a policeman who makes $32,000 a year a couple who are rich? That is what the other side would have you believe. They think this is a tax cut for the rich. I ask the question: Does a schoolteacher and a policeman believe the Federal Government can decide better how they should spend their own money than they can decide for themselves? That is what it gets down to. When I hear the other side saying this is going to cost the Government too much, I think: Who do they think this money belongs to? Do they think it belongs to the people who earn it or do they think it belongs to people in Washington, DC, who have never met the families who are paying these taxes? I think the money belongs to the people who earn it. We are looking at a $2 trillion non-Social Security surplus. We are talking about tax cuts. With the death tax and the marriage tax penalty relief that we have given in the last week in this Senate, it would be 10 percent of the projected non-Social Security surplus--10 cents on the dollar. What are we going to do with this money if we don't let people keep more of the money they earn? Are we going to dream up new programs that will not affect these people?
Kay Bailey Hutchison: “we are not talking about a tax cut today. We are talking about a tax correction. We are talking about 21 million married…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing tax equity for married couples and the implications of tax cuts.
Share
More from Kay Bailey Hutchison
if the Senator would yield for just a moment to let me say thank you to all the wonderful Senators who have spoken and said nice things. It is one of the few times Senators sort of pause and wish someone well, as they are leaving. It has…
I know there are those on my side who would also like to have a conference to talk about this. Could we have an indication as to the timeframe of the vote?
let me just say that is not the only thing we could do. We could change the cost of living to the chained consumer price index. That would be OK. It wouldn't get us as much of a deficit reduction over 75 years--a chained CPI--but it would…
today, Texas A&M University students, faculty, alumni, and fans--known as the 12th Man--are filled with pride and joy over the first Aggie to win the Heisman Trophy since John David Crow's Heisman-season in 1957. Johnny Manziel was named…





