Mr. President, if the highway trust fund were going to be affected at all, I could not be a sponsor of this amendment. But the highway trust fund is specifically held harmless. We passed a budget resolution in this Senate that said we would give $150 billion in tax relief for this Nation over the next 5 years. We are talking about roughly $12 billion of that money that we have already allocated for tax relief for hard-working Americans. That is what will keep the highway trust fund totally whole. The highway trust fund will not lose one penny. There will be no safety crisis. There will be no stoppage of money going into the flow for the highway trust fund. In fact, this is a tax relief measure because we have had a crisis that was not expected. We have had a crisis with families going on vacation, consumers, people who have to drive to work every day. What about the independent trucker who is now paying $150 to $200 a tank more than they have ever paid before because the price of gas is so high? We must give this temporary relief, as we take longer term measures to try to take our dependence on foreign oil down to a level that is acceptable. Until we do that, we need to give this immediate relief. We have it in the budget to do it. We will not touch the highway trust fund.
Kay Bailey Hutchison: “Mr. President, if the highway trust fund were going to be affected at all, I could not be a sponsor of this amendment.…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of tax relief on the highway trust fund during Senate debate.
Share
More from Kay Bailey Hutchison
I rise to talk about the looming financial crisis that all of us here are trying to solve. We are here because we know that in 4 days something that will affect every American family in not a very good way is going to happen. We are…
I have visited U.S. troops in harm's way in every conflict that we had when I was in the Senate.
I rise to talk about the Casey- Hutchison amendment which was added to the bill before us last week. I did not speak before the amendment was agreed to, but I think it is important to highlight it, particularly in light of things that…
let me just say that is not the only thing we could do. We could change the cost of living to the chained consumer price index. That would be OK. It wouldn't get us as much of a deficit reduction over 75 years--a chained CPI--but it would…





