Political Quotes

Kay Bailey Hutchison: I thank Senator Coats for his addition to my amendment, because I do think it strengthens the base amendment. What…

On the recordSeptember 2, 1998
I thank Senator Coats for his addition to my amendment, because I do think it strengthens the base amendment. What Senator McCain has done is assure, in order to get this money, that there would be no nuclear proliferation by North Korea. My amendment then comes in and says we will not allow the ballistic missile technology to be sold by North Korea to terrorist nations. I think the amendment of Senator Coats strengthens both of these by assuring the certification process is real. I think it is very clear that the Senate is speaking with a very loud voice that we are not going to continue to sit back and let North Korea break the agreement that they made, sell technology to terrorist nations that would use that technology against the United States or our allies anywhere in the world, and let them do it and reward them for it. We are not going to do it. The signal is clear. The Senate is speaking. I thank Senator Coats, I thank Senator McConnell, I thank Senator McCain for working together to send a very clear message that we want North Korea to abide by the agreement they made. If they do, we will reward them. If they do not, they will not get one penny of taxpayers' money from this country. Mr. President, I urge my amendment.
Said by
Kay Bailey Hutchison
Republican · Texas

Editor's note · Context

Discussing an amendment related to North Korea's nuclear proliferation and missile technology.

Share

More from Kay Bailey Hutchison

Jan 2, 2017

The enlargement process has and will continue to serve as a particularly effective vehicle for promoting democratic values.

congress.gov
Jan 2, 2017

That is something that has to be, from the NATO standpoint, a consensus. Some of our allies are concerned that a withdrawal would make Russia more aggressive.

congress.gov
Jan 2, 2017

Al Qaeda is our common threat. ISIS is our common threat.

congress.gov
Jan 2, 2017

I definitely think it is in NATO's purview.

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation