the bill that I introduce is the Campaign Finance Reform and Disclosure Act of 1997. This important legislation will correct several of the abuses that we have seen take place under the present system and will demonstrate to the American people that we in Congress intend to do everything possible to bring campaign-related activities into the light of day. Moreover, this bill will not force the American taxpayer to further subsidize Federal campaigns, nor will it impose an elaborate new system of costly and burdensome campaign regulations. First, the act will require that at least 60 percent of a Senate candidate's campaign funds come from individuals within that Senator's home State. It will terminate the mass mail franking privilege for Senators during the year in which he or she is seeking election, and thereby end one of the more substantial advantages of incumbents over challengers. The bill will also make the contribution limits for political action committees equal to those in place for individuals, and will index that uniform limit to the rate of inflation. I believe PAC's serve a beneficial and necessary purpose in our system by allowing groups of individuals, whether at their place of employment, through an issue advocacy group, or elsewhere, to participate in a more direct way in the grassroots political process that is at the heart of our electoral system.
Kay Bailey Hutchison: “the bill that I introduce is the Campaign Finance Reform and Disclosure Act of 1997. This important legislation will…”
Editor's note · Context
Introducing the Campaign Finance Reform and Disclosure Act of 1997.
Share
More from Kay Bailey Hutchison
I rise today to address this Chamber for possibly the last time as the senior Senator from the great State of Texas. I have to say it is an ironic note that if I had given my farewell address last week, there would have been so much joy in…
These are people who have done the right thing. They have saved. They have tried to make sure they didn't need any kind of government handout. They have earned Social Security--and that is not a government handout--and they want to know…
I agree with the President's effort to extract more from our allies in support of NATO.
let me just say that is not the only thing we could do. We could change the cost of living to the chained consumer price index. That would be OK. It wouldn't get us as much of a deficit reduction over 75 years--a chained CPI--but it would…





