I rise today to talk about the START treaty. This historic treaty is seeking, of course, to limit the strategic long-range nuclear weapons that are currently in U.S. and Russian inventory for a total of 1,550 warheads for each country. While these limits require some reductions in the number of delivery vehicles and deployed warheads both countries possess, a change in the counting of warheads will allow both countries to cut hundreds of them on paper with no actual reductions. For example, under START I, each deployed delivery vehicle was counted as carrying a specified number of warheads regardless of how many warheads were actually equipped on the missile or bomber. New START abandons these rules, instead only counting the number of warheads actually equipped on deployed missiles. In addition, strategic bombers each count as one warhead regardless of how many warheads they are actually carrying. I also have reservations because of how New START limits our ability to conduct extensive and robust verification activities to ensure compliance with the treaty.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker discusses concerns regarding the START treaty and its implications for nuclear weapons reduction and verification.
Share
More from Kay Bailey Hutchison
Decisions on enlargement are for NATO and the nation in question; no other outside country, such as Russia, has a voice in the process.
there is a lot of buzzing going on around the Capitol today. Here we are on New Year's Eve, and so many of us had hoped we would have an agreement that would be really a big agreement, a long-term agreement that we would have liked to have…
We will be asking you, Ms. McFarland, how you will represent American values in Singapore, a friend and trading partner.
we are here just hours before a looming deadline that is going to affect just about every American in some way, and I do believe both sides of the aisle and both sides of the Rotunda want to come to a conclusion that will keep us from…





