I rise to speak in favor of the Paul amendment. The Davis-Bacon Act was passed in 1931. We had a very different labor and diversity of wages. There were not minimum wages to the extent we have today. Today, every State has a different cost of living, different standards of what kinds of construction requirements there are, and thousands of buildings in this country are built in the private sector very safely, very efficiently. But when Davis-Bacon kicks in, for a government program, it skews the entire wage scale of that community, causing an inflation to other projects. The studies I have seen prove that Davis-Bacon increases costs throughout a community because it sets an artificial standard, not taking into account the cost of living in that area. No one can argue that the cost of living in New York is very different from the cost of living in Texas or West Virginia or Tennessee. We should not be trying to change the norm in an area by artificially inflating the costs, and that is exactly what Davis-Bacon does.
Kay Bailey Hutchison: “I rise to speak in favor of the Paul amendment. The Davis-Bacon Act was passed in 1931. We had a very different labor…”
Editor's note · Context
The speaker is addressing the impact of the Davis-Bacon Act on local wage scales and construction costs.
Share
More from Kay Bailey Hutchison
NATO's door is open to all European democracies which share the values of our Alliance.
Decisions on enlargement are for NATO and the nation in question; no other outside country, such as Russia, has a voice in the process.
I know there are those on my side who would also like to have a conference to talk about this. Could we have an indication as to the timeframe of the vote?
These are people who have done the right thing. They have saved. They have tried to make sure they didn't need any kind of government handout. They have earned Social Security--and that is not a government handout--and they want to know…





