I am asking for a strategy. The Government Accountability Office did issue a report this week that says the Army's justification for keeping the forces in Europe was based on a flawed analysis, and it would cost taxpayers up to $2 billion, from 2012 to 2021, to pay for it. The GAO found the decision to retain brigades in Europe to require the Army to seek roughly $176 million annually to support the Bamberg and Swineford communities, again in fiscal year 2013. The Army now estimates that not returning two of the four BCTs, brigade combat teams, in Europe to the United States could potentially cost between $1 billion and $2 billion between fiscal years 2012 and 2021. It will cost an average of 360 million American dollars per year to retain those units in Europe that were scheduled to be moved to America. Closing the Heidelberg facility and moving the headquarters to Wiesbaden--the Army estimated that move from Heidelberg to go to Wiesbaden would save hundreds of millions of dollars in 2013. But the GAO found the Army now admits they will need $150 million annually to support the continuing operation in Heidelberg because of delays.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker addresses the financial implications of U.S. Army forces remaining in Europe.
Share
More from Kay Bailey Hutchison
Well, first of all, NATO is not obsolete, and I think the President has acknowledged that...
if the Senator would yield for just a moment to let me say thank you to all the wonderful Senators who have spoken and said nice things. It is one of the few times Senators sort of pause and wish someone well, as they are leaving. It has…
I want to say that we all will miss Senator Inouye. He was one of the most loved people who have ever served in this Senate. But I also want to say that we have passed on now and will take the bill in its entirety later. But because of the…
We will be asking you, Ms. McFarland, how you will represent American values in Singapore, a friend and trading partner.





