There are good reasons to have reservations about a proposal that discards billions of dollars of important technology and engineering advancements paid for by American taxpayers.
Kay Bailey Hutchison: “There are good reasons to have reservations about a proposal that discards billions of dollars of important technology…”
Editor's note · Context
Hutchison highlights concerns over the proposal's disregard for taxpayer-funded advancements.
Share
More from Kay Bailey Hutchison
These are people who have done the right thing. They have saved. They have tried to make sure they didn't need any kind of government handout. They have earned Social Security--and that is not a government handout--and they want to know…
Well, first of all, NATO is not obsolete, and I think the President has acknowledged that...
let me just say that is not the only thing we could do. We could change the cost of living to the chained consumer price index. That would be OK. It wouldn't get us as much of a deficit reduction over 75 years--a chained CPI--but it would…
That is something that has to be, from the NATO standpoint, a consensus. Some of our allies are concerned that a withdrawal would make Russia more aggressive.





