I know what it is like to have to make those decisions on a State budget when you are getting mandates from the Federal Government and you have to say, ``Do I increase the elderly's light bill or the water bill of an elderly person because I have this mandate from the Federal Government?'' It is very difficult for elderly people to make ends meet. So when we are talking about eliminating a category of the elderly or children and their effects, I wonder if we have considered the effects of raising a water bill because of an environmental mandate that perhaps does not meet a cost-benefit analysis. All of these things that we are trying to prevent the Federal Government from passing to the States are going to have an impact for the good on children and the elderly. In fact, I think we have to say what this amendment really is. It is an amendment that will gut the bill.
Kay Bailey Hutchison: “I know what it is like to have to make those decisions on a State budget when you are getting mandates from the Federal…”
On the recordJanuary 24, 1995
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of an amendment proposed by Senator Boxer regarding federal mandates on state budgets.
Share
More from Kay Bailey Hutchison
Jan 2, 2017
Well, first of all, NATO is not obsolete, and I think the President has acknowledged that...
Dec 6, 2012
I know there are those on my side who would also like to have a conference to talk about this. Could we have an indication as to the timeframe of the vote?
Nov 14, 2012
How much time is remaining on our side? The PRESIDING OFFICER. There is 20 minutes remaining.
Nov 14, 2012
These are people who have done the right thing. They have saved. They have tried to make sure they didn't need any kind of government handout. They have earned Social Security--and that is not a government handout--and they want to know…





