In fact, I think it should be pointed out for the Record that, on March 18 of this year, the Senate voted 71 to 29 to protect our States' settlement funds by defeating an amendment that would have directed that states spend at least half of their settlements according to whatever specific list of programs the Secretary of Health and Human Services designated during any given year. Thus, the Senate rejected the notion that the federal government should have an annual veto over more than $140 billion of state funds. I think it is also worth noting that the Hutchison/Graham legislation we introduced this year to protect these state funds from federal seizure had 47 cosponsors, including substantial bipartisan support. The legislation was signed into law by the President on May 21, 1999.
Kay Bailey Hutchison: “In fact, I think it should be pointed out for the Record that, on March 18 of this year, the Senate voted 71 to 29 to…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Senate's vote on state settlement funds and related legislation.
Share
More from Kay Bailey Hutchison
I agree with the President's effort to extract more from our allies in support of NATO.
Thank you. Are there other speakers on our side? Let me ask the Chair to notify me when there is 10 minutes left in case Senator Collins comes or someone else. So I would like to have up to 10 minutes and be notified. Mr. President, I rise…
there is a lot of buzzing going on around the Capitol today. Here we are on New Year's Eve, and so many of us had hoped we would have an agreement that would be really a big agreement, a long-term agreement that we would have liked to have…
I have visited U.S. troops in harm's way in every conflict that we had when I was in the Senate.





