I have never seen a case in which a person who is totally qualified, a person who has shown integrity on the bench, and who has the academic credentials to be a great Federal judge would be turned down for, really, I think a litmus test on issues. In the past administration--the Clinton administration--I voted for a number of judges with whom I disagreed philosophically, judges who I knew would rule differently from what I thought would be the 'right vote' on the court. But I tried to see what their qualifications were. I certainly tried to see if they would be strict constructionists to the Constitution, if they would adhere to the law rather than be traditional judicial activists. I voted for people with whom I disagreed many times. Today, I don't think that could be said for members of the Judiciary Committee. I am told there has never been a nominee who had the unanimous qualified recommendation from the American Bar Association and the support of both home State Senators who has been turned down for a traditional nomination.
Kay Bailey Hutchison: “I have never seen a case in which a person who is totally qualified, a person who has shown integrity on the bench, and…”
On the recordSeptember 5, 2002
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Addressing the Judiciary Committee's rejection of Supreme Court Justice Priscilla Owen's nomination.
Share
More from Kay Bailey Hutchison
Jan 2, 2017
I have visited U.S. troops in harm's way in every conflict that we had when I was in the Senate.
Nov 14, 2012
We also have the endorsement of the National Association of Manufacturers, the American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers, the American Petroleum Institute, US Telecom, the National Retail Federation, Financial Services Roundtable, the…
Dec 21, 2012
I want to say that we all will miss Senator Inouye. He was one of the most loved people who have ever served in this Senate. But I also want to say that we have passed on now and will take the bill in its entirety later. But because of the…





