This amendment effectively undermines many of the most important provisions of this Bankruptcy Reform Act that have been part of the House approach to bankruptcy reform since the last Congress. This amendment should be opposed for many reasons. The Nadler amendment would do little, if anything, to address the abuse of the bankruptcy system that has become increasingly prevalent. For instance, this amendment would strike from the bill key provisions that aim to prevent debtors from loading up on debt just before declaring bankruptcy, thereby obtaining a discharge of this debt. Such loading up has occurred more frequently as bankruptcy planning becomes more common in this day and age. In addition, this amendment would eliminate from the bill's needs-based test the use of clear, objective standards.
John Hope Bryant: “This amendment effectively undermines many of the most important provisions of this Bankruptcy Reform Act that have been…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment to the Bankruptcy Reform Act during House floor debate.
Share
More from John Hope Bryant
I would observe that the same taxpayers that the gentleman from Georgia, Mr. Deal, was speaking of would have to pay the cost of the law enforcement which would result from having all these kids on the street, the cost of the schools…
It is a difficult task to stand up here and follow the fine gentleman from Pennsylvania... let us do the right thing and vote for this amendment.
I too want to add my appreciation for all the hard work that the chairman has done in coming up with this very fine bill. As I sat here and listened to some of the debate, I realized that talk is cheap but prescription drugs are not cheap…
I do want to emphasize what she said in her opening statement; that this is certainly a bill that, I believe regardless of whether we might be pro-choice or pro-life, we can support. Because what we are talking about here in the underlying…





