I would observe that the same taxpayers that the gentleman from Georgia, Mr. Deal, was speaking of would have to pay the cost of the law enforcement which would result from having all these kids on the street, the cost of the schools checking the citizenship of every kid in the school in an effort to find a handful who might not be here legally, and all the other attendant costs. That is why these institutions all oppose this approach.
Discussing the financial implications of immigration policies during a House debate.
Share
More from John Hope Bryant
let me respond briefly that the Constitution itself talks about impeachment as well as election. The two processes are compatible, according to our forefathers, since they completely understood that you had first to be elected in order to…
the opposing side has made a point that Ms. Lewinsky said that the President never specifically told her to lie. Yet they had engaged in a very clear cover story for a number of months in terms of how she had access to the President when…
I think it is one that we ought to pass, and I urge my colleagues to support it. It seems like we can agree on an awful lot of things today. We all want more education, better health care for our young people and we all want to make sure…
I do want to emphasize what she said in her opening statement; that this is certainly a bill that, I believe regardless of whether we might be pro-choice or pro-life, we can support. Because what we are talking about here in the underlying…
Other voices in this conversation
