I just took note of the fact that the gentleman said a moment ago that for some kind of a loophole in the RICO statute that allows people to sue securities dealers who they believe are guilty of a pattern of fraudulent activity, but I am looking here at the language from the statute: 18 U.S.C. says that actually racketeering; that is, predicate action with the RICO statue, include, quote, any fees involving fraud and the sales of securities. I ask, ``In view of that, how can you describe this as a loophole?''
John Hope Bryant: “I just took note of the fact that the gentleman said a moment ago that for some kind of a loophole in the RICO statute…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the RICO statute and its implications for securities fraud during a floor debate.
Share
More from John Hope Bryant
It is a difficult task to stand up here and follow the fine gentleman from Pennsylvania... let us do the right thing and vote for this amendment.
We're one America. America as a country is an idea. We can make it whatever we want. And that is not demonizing people. It's a dog whistle and it needs to stop.
I think it is all our responsibilities to take the next step and say what would be the actual result of doing what the gentleman is advocating. Nobody wants illegal immigrants to be in this country, but the simple fact is not one single…
With over 60,000 documents, in the presentation of the White House lawyer, Mr. Ruff, he made no challenge to the testimony of Betty Currie, Monica Lewinsky or anyone else in the factual situation that we have had before us.





