Political Quotes

John Hope Bryant: Are you not reading the papers? Are you not aware that high-ranking Members of Congress of both parties are presently…

On the recordFebruary 10, 1994
Are you not reading the papers? Are you not aware that high-ranking Members of Congress of both parties are presently under investigation? Is there some indication otherwise? Have you not read the law? I will not yield again. Have you not read the law that says clearly Members of Congress are covered? It is optional, but what the gentleman wants to do is to make it mandatory. They continue this rhetoric that somehow we are not treated like all other Americans. The independent counsel statute was written for 60 people who have become such good friends with the Attorney General that we cannot rely on human beings who serve as Attorney General to investigate objectively or to prosecute. Only 60. Everybody else is treated the same. The public integrity unit, the drug unit, every other unit out there is out and available to the prosecutors to investigate us, just like the general public. That is the way it ought to be. I will be back in a moment with an amendment to the Gekas amendment that I think gives every Member an opportunity to vote on the principle that Members ought to be covered, but the coverage ought to be at the discretion of the Attorney General.
Said by
John Hope Bryant
Texas

Editor's note · Context

The speaker addresses the investigation of high-ranking Members of Congress and the implications of the independent counsel statute.

Share

More from John Hope Bryant

Oct 12, 2001

I have over the years, though, become convinced that some adjustments are needed to our criminal law. Given the significantly greater ability of the criminal, particularly the terrorists, to freely operate worldwide, and given the…

govinfo.gov
Sep 25, 1996

I once again take issue with this characterization of the bill. This is not the bill that the House voted on; it is not the bill the Senate voted on. It is a bill that the Republicans spent 4 months behind closed doors cooking up so it…

govinfo.gov
Mar 21, 1996

I think it is extremely unfair and extremely inaccurate for the advocates of this amendment to describe the bill as antifamily. It is not antifamily. What it does is recognize what the Jordan Commission observed, and that is that we have…

govinfo.gov
Dec 18, 1998

let me respond briefly that the Constitution itself talks about impeachment as well as election. The two processes are compatible, according to our forefathers, since they completely understood that you had first to be elected in order to…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation