I think it is extremely unfair and extremely inaccurate for the advocates of this amendment to describe the bill as antifamily. It is not antifamily. What it does is recognize what the Jordan Commission observed, and that is that we have chain migration and we cannot continue forever allowing everyone who is allowed to come into the country legally to bring in brothers and sisters. That is really what is at stake here. The same recommendation was made in 1981 by Father Hessburgh's commission. It is not a radical proposal. What is radical is the idea of doing nothing, which is what they advocate, and letting the population increase to 500 million people in this country.
John Hope Bryant: “I think it is extremely unfair and extremely inaccurate for the advocates of this amendment to describe the bill as…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about an amendment related to immigration policy.
Share
More from John Hope Bryant
I might add that I want to again honor the Constitution by what we do today. I think we all share that. And while the polls seem to show one thing, they also seem to show that many people would like this President to resign, in fact a…
I rise this afternoon as a cosponsor of this bill and in strong support of this legislation and urge my colleagues to vote in support of it. While there are fundamental differences between us regarding the prolife and prochoice debate, for…
let me echo what the gentleman from Pennsylvania is saying. I was a late baby. My mother is actually 93 years old and will be 94 her next birthday. The medical technology is great. A couple of years ago, she had a pacemaker put in, I…
if they are coming to get a job and they have kids, the kids are coming. Do we want, as a matter of national policy, to have these kids wandering the streets? We might hear it said in a moment, well, the new version of this does not…





