I would strongly oppose the gentleman's amendment now that I learn that it is in addition to rather than in place of, for the simple reason that as you have constructed it now, first the plaintiff who has no resources and is obviously frightened by the situation in the beginning files a lawsuit, then they first have got to get past the potential of having a judge force them to pay attorneys fees based upon your provision, and if they get past that, then they are faced with at the end of the case having to pay attorneys fees based upon what the Republicans have come up with. It is doubly bad, rather than an improvement, and I would strongly urge Members to vote against this amendment.
John Hope Bryant: “I would strongly oppose the gentleman's amendment now that I learn that it is in addition to rather than in place of…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment related to attorney fees in lawsuits during a House floor debate.
Share
More from John Hope Bryant
In order to have effective bankruptcy reform, we need to have in this bill a set of uniform standards as to whether or not someone should be allowed to file in Chapter 7 or in Chapter 13 bankruptcy. The reason I oppose this amendment is…
H.R. 833 is a necessary bill, and this is a good rule to support to move that bill forward. H.R. 833 restores fairness and common sense and personal responsibility to a bankruptcy code that, in many ways, is out of control. Current…
I think it would have been best, frankly, had my good friend, the gentleman from California [Mr. Gallegly], who I believe to be quite sincere about this, had simply brought to the floor the original amendment which says flatly that we are…
I do want to emphasize what she said in her opening statement; that this is certainly a bill that, I believe regardless of whether we might be pro-choice or pro-life, we can support. Because what we are talking about here in the underlying…





