The response is very simple. It is public land. Even private foresters are moving away from clearcutting. Why would we want on land owned by you and me and our neighbors to strip the land bare, down to the flat muddy soil, and cause all of the negative impacts of clearcutting to take place on land we own, when we could do otherwise? We own it. Why should we not handle it in such a way that the public would want us to handle it?
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the management of public land and the impacts of clearcutting.
Share
More from John Hope Bryant
The bill is sitting on the podium right in front of the gentleman, if he wants to read it, and furthermore, I would say the bill has been out since the subcommittee reported it out last November. So if any Member has not read it, it is not…
If this bill doesn't pass today, that's exactly what's going to happen. We're going to be back out here voting----
I say to the gentleman, Mr. Mfume, let me answer you in the quickest way possible. The answer to that question is simply this: They do not want to have to reveal their lobbying contacts with the executive branch, and they have cloaked that…
I am glad we are moving to the end of this debate. I think it has been a good debate. We have strong words that have been spoken throughout it. Strong feelings, of course, exist on both sides. In fact, we are trying to pass a bill today…





