The response is very simple. It is public land. Even private foresters are moving away from clearcutting. Why would we want on land owned by you and me and our neighbors to strip the land bare, down to the flat muddy soil, and cause all of the negative impacts of clearcutting to take place on land we own, when we could do otherwise? We own it. Why should we not handle it in such a way that the public would want us to handle it?
John Hope Bryant: “The response is very simple. It is public land. Even private foresters are moving away from clearcutting. Why would we…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the management of public land and the impacts of clearcutting.
Share
More from John Hope Bryant
They made this pledge not under political duress, not in response to protest, but we thought out of conscious and clean hands.
We're one America. America as a country is an idea. We can make it whatever we want. And that is not demonizing people. It's a dog whistle and it needs to stop.
This amendment effectively undermines many of the most important provisions of this Bankruptcy Reform Act that have been part of the House approach to bankruptcy reform since the last Congress. This amendment should be opposed for many…
Mr. Speaker, at the request, as has been said, of our former colleague and the very distinguished Governor of Tennessee, Don Sundquist, and also the very distinguished Governor of the State of Mississippi, Kirk Fordice, I, along with the…





