I think that she's way off base. I think what's happened is the defense in its argument is turning the Presidential Records Act on its head, and she seems to have bought that.
John E. Jones III: “I think that she's way off base. I think what's happened is the defense in its argument is turning the Presidential…”
Editor's note · Context
John E. Jones III critiques Judge Aileen Cannon's interpretation of the Presidential Records Act in relation to Trump's case.
Share
More from John E. Jones III
I think they're kind of playing hide the ball, not inappropriately with some witnesses. I agree with your panelists that Hope Hicks is going to be a very interesting and maybe a pivotal witness to tie the former president or not to what…
I think it's scurrilous. Anderson, I spent a number of years on the Judicial Security Committee of the Judicial Council of the United States, and I'm well-versed in threats to judges. But this now transcends that, we're talking about…
It is astonishing to me that she hasn't offloaded some of this stuff and that she's arrogated to herself the responsibility to hear it.





