That is correct. As a part of the settlement agreement, there is an alternative settlement procedure that gives the State the right to do so. That alternative settlement agreement was not a part of the public record. What is a part of the public record is, and it was unequivocal in the conference report, in the report language and in all the public comments, was that if the House and the Senate would agree, this $65 million would in fact be used to build this cancer research and treatment center if it passed peer review, which it did.
Joe Barton: “That is correct. As a part of the settlement agreement, there is an alternative settlement procedure that gives the…”
On the recordJuly 11, 1995
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the settlement agreement related to funding for a cancer research and treatment center.
Share
More from Joe Barton
Jul 23, 2018
It doesn't change the basic mission statement. It doesn't change the authorized level of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve.
Dec 11, 2018
Before I yield to Dr. Burgess, I echo what Congresswoman Castor just said about the staffs that have worked so hard. We couldn't have done this bill without all the individuals she just named. I also thank her. When she said I have been…
Sep 4, 2018
Now, I want to ask Mr. Salo, you have mentioned two principles that legislation that actually works should have. You mentioned flexibility. Does ACE Kids have flexibility?





