this morning, I introduced on behalf of myself, Chairman Tom Bliley, our Republican Members, and Democrat cosponsors, the Communications Act of 1995. Hearings are planned for Wednesday, May 10, Thursday, May 11, and Friday, May 12. Truly, this is a watershed and historic moment for the telecommunication industry, our country, and the consuming public. This legislation meets several broad objectives: First, and foremost, the legislation gives definition and certainty as we move into this time of convergence and technological innovation. Second, this legislation is much more deregulatory than the telecommunications legislation, introduced and passed last year. This legislation recognizes that the 1934 act is outdated--a dinosaur--and coupled with a hodgepodge of FCC administrative decisions and Federal court decisions, the telecommunications industry could be stifled and the consumer denied better products and services at lower costs unless we pass this historic legislation. Third, great attention was paid in creating level playing fields--an atmosphere of legislative parity so that the rules are fair to all competitors as new lines of business are entered. Fourth, it was our goal and objective for our legislation to be dynamic so that it evolves with and recognizes new technology and its applications. Fifth, our legislation is predicated on competition and an opportunity model not government, be it Federal or State micromanagement.
Jack Fields: “this morning, I introduced on behalf of myself, Chairman Tom Bliley, our Republican Members, and Democrat cosponsors…”
Editor's note · Context
Introducing the Communications Act of 1995 and its objectives during a House floor speech.
Share
More from Jack Fields
Most countries cannot stand in that glare, in that spotlight, and I have every confidence in you and Chairman Fleming being able to make a real difference.
I encourage you to get as much information as you can from our government, from international entities and come forward with a bipartisan collaborative process that really does work.
this amendment contains only technical and conforming changes that have been agreed to by the majority and minority. The amendments clarify that disclosure is required for both proposed and final settlements, and that such disclosures…
Both portions of the motion to recommit we have already voted on. The Dingell amendment, we do not want to see a dual standard: one standard that applies to municipalities and cities, and another standard that applies to everyone else. In…





