Political Quotes

Jack Fields: Both portions of the motion to recommit we have already voted on. The Dingell amendment, we do not want to see a dual…

On the recordMarch 8, 1995
Both portions of the motion to recommit we have already voted on. The Dingell amendment, we do not want to see a dual standard: one standard that applies to municipalities and cities, and another standard that applies to everyone else. In regard to the Manton amendment, we do not want to see the 'loser pays' provision weakened. What we do want to see, Mr. Speaker, is H.R. 1058 should not be changed as it was brought to the House because it revolutionizes the standard by which disputes arising under the securities laws are litigated. This truly is a historic moment. This legislation will introduce for the first time the concept of proportional liability into the Federal securities laws. A defendant may be liable for joint and several damages only if found to have acted knowingly. Defendants found liable for recklessness will be held proportionately liable. Arguably, this is the most significant development in private securities litigation in the 61 years since the Securities Act was passed. The bill also provides that the losing party, his attorney, or both, will pay the prevailing party's legal fees if the court enters a final judgment against them.
Said by
Jack Fields
Texas

Editor's note · Context

Discussing the implications of H.R. 1058 on securities law during House debate.

Share

More from Jack Fields

Mar 7, 1995

we need only compare the provisions of this legislation with those of the RICO statute in order to identify those reforms that plaintiffs' attorneys will be able to avoid. H.R. 1058, this legislation, has a losers pay provision. RICO does…

govinfo.gov
Apr 14, 2026

let me first thank the Speaker for allowing the Congressional Black Caucus to use this first Special Order hour to commemorate the life and legacy of my mentor, my leader, and my friend, the Reverend Jesse Louis Jackson, Sr. I was a…

govinfo.gov
Mar 8, 1995

Mr. Chairman, as we are having this debate I think it is important for all of us as Members not to forget certain points. Point No. 1 mentioned by Chairman Bliley just a moment ago is if you take this sentence out of the statute as the…

govinfo.gov
Mar 8, 1995

Mr. Chairman, let me, first of all, address what I almost hear as a basic assumption that the underlying piece of legislation is bad. This is not a bad piece of legislation. This legislation is aimed at the filing of frivolous lawsuits…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation