Now we've got to move forward, and I think we can, in a lot of ways.

There is enormous support in our country for what Chairman Gorbachev is doing inside the Soviet Union.

This meeting accomplished everything that I had hoped it would.

I wouldn't say allies, but with far less misunderstanding and with far more common goals.

There's also a great potential to develop common opportunities.

No, we had more time yesterday than we thought we'd have.

Yes, everything is possible.

A better U.S.-Soviet relationship is to be valued in and of itself, but it also should be an instrument of positive change for the world.

It worked exactly the way I visualized it when we took the initiative.

It doesn't matter where you meet.

I think it's a major step towards understanding and in trying to tear down any remaining barriers that shot up because of the cold war.

NATO would remain the cornerstone of the West's efforts to manage peaceful change in Europe.

This is not an arms control summit.

I had known President Gorbachev before, and I'd let him speak for himself.

No, we could have floated the Holiday Inn out there to do it on.

I think we ought to go forward and try to get a START agreement.

We're going to have to leave at 1:20 p.m.

No, it was a very good idea.

We can sit there and talk about issues of which we've had divisions over the years, try to find ways to narrow them.

There is enormous respect and support for the way he has advocated peaceful change in Europe.

I feel we have much more understanding between the parties as a result of that discussion.

I think the climate, as a result of these talks, for investment inside the Soviet Union is a big plus.

Thank you, sir, for your hospitality.

We will try to help.

We feel this has been a very productive day in terms of the 5-hour meeting this morning.