There was another study by DOE that showed if we replaced China's and India's coal-burning oilers with natural gas, they would reduce their emissions by 40 percent.
Dan Crenshaw
The Public Record
Dan Crenshaw is an American politician and former Navy SEAL officer currently serving as the U.S. Representative for Texas's 2nd congressional district since January 3, 2019. A member of the Republican Party, Crenshaw has focused on issues such as national security, veterans' affairs, and economic policy during his time in office. He gained national attention for his advocacy on military and foreign policy matters, leveraging his military background to inform his legislative priorities.
This is a really important subject because the question is not whether about supporting environmentalism or supporting cleaner air.
When we're talking about solutions--and again, I want to get back to this main truth, which is that America is the innovation capital of the world, and ignoring that or destroying that capability by destroying the fossil fuel industry is…
We could do something like implement a Green New Deal and ban fossil fuels, and we would take care of 15 percent of emissions worldwide.
Let me be clear, Mr. Kennedy. You guys are at a point where you can operate in a stand-alone way; is that correct?
The question is not whether about supporting environmentalism or supporting cleaner air. The question is about how we do it and what the best way to do that is, and playing to our strengths as Americans.
I introduced this bipartisan legislation earlier this year with my colleague, Dr. Brad Wenstrup (R-OH-2)
Our legislation makes a one-time authorization of $10 million to carry out these provisions.
I mean, if you look around the world as far as threats at a very tactical level, they are probably one of the most capable groups.
Is there more we can be doing with the Mexican government? Is there a better relationship that could be had or is that at a good place right now?
I share the Majority's concern regarding the necessity of enforcing the standards for safety and security of ICE detainees.
Four days instead of 3 days is not exactly a huge stretch of the imagination.
the issue isn't necessarily that there is not enough grants or not the right grants; the issue is that we are not tying that grant money to the right basic practices.
The health and well-being of those detained in the United States is not a partisan issue.
It is great because it exposes two very different ways of thinking about our economy, opportunity, and the mutually shared goal of overcoming poverty.
It is hard to imagine a more inefficient and ineffective way to reduce poverty.
Instead of creating resentment against success, we focus on who actually needs our help, which is the people who are having trouble moving up the economic ladder.
I don't believe the resource allocation argument that we need... to be repositioned against China.
Any premature withdrawal from any place, to include Afghanistan, is a Saigon.





