The question was raised and has not been answered: Why would prosecutors oppose this amendment? It is like any work product. Once you put your work into something, you are duty-bound to defend that work product, are you not?
Craig Washington: “The question was raised and has not been answered: Why would prosecutors oppose this amendment? It is like any work…”
Editor's note · Context
Questioning the opposition of prosecutors to a specific amendment during a debate.
Share
More from Craig Washington
It is a fact that over 80 percent of the death row appeals, and specifically the reversals, are based upon lawyer error, that is, people had incompetent lawyers to try death penalty cases to begin with; right?
This is not the Washington-Edwards amendment. My amendment would have done a lot more, a lot more forcefully and a lot more, but the committee decided on your version rather than mine, which is quintessentially, in my judgment, a much…
I disagree with my distinguished dean that we should not debate the substance, because I do not think that anybody should be allowed to come to these microphones with the American people watching and have you make statements like you made…
as I ponder the President's possible remarks later this evening on the State of the Union, I thought it was important to discuss some things that address what I believe will be the principal subject of the President's remarks. I am happy…





