I keep hearing we should not give the Department of Defense special treatment. But the truth is if every Federal agency had been cut like the Department of Defense, we would not even have a deficit problem. The Frank amendment will not reduce the deficit by one dime. What it will do is cut military training, COLA's, housing, and possibly even health care to open the door for pork-barrel politics. Above all, $2.4 billion in extra cuts would mean we are willing to put the lives of our military personnel at greater risk in future conflicts. We have no right to do that. Vote ``no'' on the Frank amendment.
Chet Edwards: “I keep hearing we should not give the Department of Defense special treatment. But the truth is if every Federal agency…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing the Frank amendment during a debate on defense budget cuts.
Share
More from Chet Edwards
We have had a lot of disagreements on how to end the Iraq war and on the budget plan of the administration.
I rise in strong support of the Stenholm balanced-budget amendment. I would like to specifically address four of the key arguments I have heard today used against this amendment. First, the opponents say we have to have the ability to…
on Monday, 2 days ago, I was visiting in a rural newspaper office in Glen Rose, Texas, in my district. I was discussing the Children's Health Insurance Program when one of the employees there, Lindsey Brewer, heard of our conversation and…
I am deeply disappointed that the Republican leadership has placed an incredibly unfair gag rule on a constitutional debate of historic proportions





