I keep hearing we should not give the Department of Defense special treatment. But the truth is if every Federal agency had been cut like the Department of Defense, we would not even have a deficit problem. The Frank amendment will not reduce the deficit by one dime. What it will do is cut military training, COLA's, housing, and possibly even health care to open the door for pork-barrel politics. Above all, $2.4 billion in extra cuts would mean we are willing to put the lives of our military personnel at greater risk in future conflicts. We have no right to do that. Vote ``no'' on the Frank amendment.
Chet Edwards: “I keep hearing we should not give the Department of Defense special treatment. But the truth is if every Federal agency…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing the Frank amendment during a debate on defense budget cuts.
Share
More from Chet Edwards
Considering the historical importance of this vote today and the precedent we will set for decades to come, would it be within the rules of the House for me at this time to ask unanimous consent that each Member of this House, who feels in…
I am deeply disappointed that the Republican leadership has placed an incredibly unfair gag rule on a constitutional debate of historic proportions
As Speaker Jim Wright asked from the well of this House in 1989, When will this mindless cannibalism end?'' How many good public officials must be destroyed because of their private sins and human imperfections? When will we stop using the…
We have had a lot of disagreements on how to end the Iraq war and on the budget plan of the administration.





