considering the historical importance of this vote today and the precedent we will set for decades to come, would it be within the rules of the House for me at this time to ask unanimous consent that each Member of this House, who feels in his or her conscience that he or she would want to speak for 2 minutes on this issue, be allowed that opportunity as they try to represent the 560,000 people in their district? The SPEAKER
Chet Edwards: “considering the historical importance of this vote today and the precedent we will set for decades to come, would it be…”
Share
More from Chet Edwards
as Speaker Jim Wright asked from the well of this House in 1989, When will this mindless cannibalism end?'' How many good public officials must be destroyed because of their private sins and human imperfections? When will we stop using the…
I come from rural central Texas. It is a land where guns and hunting are a way of life. I believe in the 2d amendment. But my colleagues, the constitutions was never intended to make efficient killing machines out of drug dealers…
I keep hearing we should not give the Department of Defense special treatment. But the truth is if every Federal agency had been cut like the Department of Defense, we would not even have a deficit problem. The Frank amendment will not…
I am deeply disappointed that the Republican leadership has placed an incredibly unfair gag rule on a constitutional debate of historic proportions





