Much of the debate today has addressed issues that are important but peripheral to the focus of this bill, which is the size and organization of the State Department and associated foreign policy agencies. Going back to the Nixon administration, numerous reviews have been conducted by the Foreign Relations Committee, its House counterpart, and many executive branch-appointed groups to determine how best to streamline the array of foreign policy agencies that exist. My staff at the Oversight of Government Management has studied this issue, as well. A common theme of these reviews has been that more efficiencies can be achieved, and this probably should include the merging of some existing agencies. The conference report now before the Senate directs, in essence, the elimination of at least one of three agencies--the Agency for International Development [AID], the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency [ACDA], or the U.S. Information Agency [USIA]--with primary focus on AID and ACDA.
Steve Cohen: “Much of the debate today has addressed issues that are important but peripheral to the focus of this bill, which is the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the organization and efficiency of foreign policy agencies during a Senate debate.
Share
More from Steve Cohen
President Trump was offered this $400 million airplane. He said he thought it was a ``nice gesture.'' A nice gesture is when somebody passes the salt and pepper. That is a nice gesture. A nice gesture is when somebody says, ``Good morning…
I had a community meeting this weekend and met with some folks in Memphis. The issues that they were most interested in were immigration, ICE. They were very concerned about the people from ICE with masks on their faces mistreating people…
As you wind down your term of Governor, consider your Christian background as you implement policies that will define your legacy.
I’ve been effective from age 26 to age 76, and I’ll be effective at age 77 and at age 78. Because I do one thing, and I do it well, and that’s legislating.





