Scott DesJarlais

I would argue right now that most people crossing the southern border have learned that.

If you are a non-citizen child under 18, you receive benefits?

Okay, and do you have concerns with how current transportation costs may limit the reach of the Food for Progress Program?

Do you know, does USAID have controls in place to prevent U.S. dollars from supporting Russian businesses or others that directly compete with U.S. farmers?

Some of the environmental community have continued to villainize farmers and ranchers even though modern American agriculture is the most sustainable in the world, and clearly provides climate benefits.

As we struggle with the trucking shortage and supply chain issues, we are experiencing 40 year high inflation, record fuel prices, fertilizer shortages, crippling and overburdensome EPA regulations that creates even more uncertainty.

If you are an asylum-seeker under Section 208, you receive benefits?

The last thing they need, and so many others in agriculture, is more regulations.

We want to make sure that in this farm bill, the conservation title does not become the climate title.

Our farmers and ranchers have been unfairly labeled as climate criminals by some, and that cannot be further from the truth.

This hard mandate just feels like it is going to create a disaster, almost like we saw in the withdrawal from Afghanistan.

I am pro-vaccine, I am vaccinated, but it is not right for everyone.

What will USDA's involvement be in both this case and in preventing the spread of EP in the United States?

The fact that able-bodied people who can work, should work, is a pretty common concept.

The SNAP Program is there to help people who are hungry, make sure that they have food in their mouths and that hunger is reduced.

But it's reasonable, then, if you found agents with political bias against the President that were then assigned to the Russia probe, that certainly that is something that needs to be looked at.

Do you think that this probe, the Russian probe, then, could potentially have been tainted by the same political bias?

I mean think that's a really important point to drive home, is that the physicians that are prescribing the opioids were doing that at a lower rate, but the opioids are getting in the wrong hands.

I think that is an issue that over 80 percent of America agrees on, whether you are Democrat, independent, or Republican, so I think that is a winning issue.

That should be a crime. And it probably is, but it's not enforced.

I know that I would make it a point to educate my patients on the power of these drugs.

I think it's, yeah, probably more than something we should talk about.

I think there's responsibility among the patients to know that it should be illegal to share these drugs.

As a former physician and current holder of a DEA license, I know that I would make it a point to educate my patients on the power of these drugs.

Can folks in Tennessee count on you to be supportive of the Walking Horse industry, and facilitate scientific and objective inspection methods to eliminate soring?