there was not one iota, we saw a chart at the end with no debate. There was not a witness that came forward on the internal programs of NIST, that I recall, that the committee said, ``What are you doing that for? That is not part of your core mission.'' There was none of that in our committee, nothing, not one word. What we are saying is this committee report language has a chilling effect on what the gentleman and I both want, and that is standards research out at NIST. We are willing to amend our amendment to say standards-related research and development in these four areas. I do not know how the gentleman could possibly object to standards-related research and development.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about the impact of committee report language on standards research at NIST.
Share
More from John Tanner
I want to thank Mr. Capuano and Members of the House Sudan Caucus for introducing this resolution to remind us of the important work that needs to be done to implement the final stages of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement between the…
I don't have or didn't have a closer friend in Congress than Paul Gillmor. He was not only an extraordinarily talented individual who made people comfortable around him, but he also had a leadership quality that I observed up close and…
This resolution goes hand in glove with the one that we just took up. It commends the George Marshall European Center for Security Studies. Last year when we visited the NATO School in Oberammergau, we went then to the Marshall Center…
On August 5, 2010, 10 unarmed humanitarian aid workers affiliated with the International Assistance Mission... were brutally killed in Badakhshan province, Afghanistan. There were six Americans among the murdered aid workers. These brave…





